Does @FlyingFree333 follow what his Twitter bio lists about him?

Reading Time: 4 minutes

For a few years @FlyingFree333 has been following me on Twitter. And he has asked a few good questions about God and the Bible which I’ve answered for him either in Tweets and/or here on my blog and YouTube.

Yet @FlyingFree333 has taken to RT’ing some of my tweets out of context. He has even gone so far as to actually make up RTs from me which I have never Tweeted.

So from him doing these false RTs and out of context RTs from me, I decided to look at his Twitter bio (see graphic) in hope of finding out a bit more about him.

FlyingFree333 Twitter Bio
FlyingFree333 Twitter Bio

As you can see from the graphic of his Twitter bio, @FlyingFree333 lists the following as his attributes:

atheism #materialism #evidentialism #naturalism #skeptic #antitheism #polyamory

And @FlyingFree333 makes this statement in his Twitter bio:

“Truth and compassion form morality, foremost being compassion.”

I’ve asked @FlyingFree333 a number of times if he believes he is following what he’s written in his Twitter bio. He has yet to reply to me.

What does @FlyingFree333 bio state?
Let’s review what he’s listed as his attributes and consider each as to if he adheres to each of them or not.

Well, these five are rather redundant; #atheism #materialism #evidentialism #naturalism #antitheism, and from knowing @FlyingFree333 for so many years now, I can state absolutely that he follows these attributes listed in his bio to the letter and without any doubt does so daily however with caveat (which I’ll cover below).

I can also state that seemingly to me @FlyingFree333 follows the attribute of being a #skeptic in regard to and in adherence to the boundaries confining and defining being #skeptic per his being #atheism #materialism #evidentialism #naturalism and #antitheism.

As for @FlyingFree333 being #polyamory (from Greek πολύ poly, “many, several”, and Latin amor, “love” is the practice, desire, or acceptance of having more than one intimate relationship at a time with the knowledge and consent of everyone involved. It is distinct from swinging (which emphasizes sex with others as merely recreational) and may or may not include polysexuality (attraction towards multiple genders and/or sexes), I can only assume @FlyingFree333 is #polyamory and comfortable knowing that the people he has sex with are not commited to him and are always looking for someone better than him to have sex with at all times.

This brings us to the statement by @FlyingFree333 about “Truth and compassion form morality, foremost being compassion.” Thus the caveat I mentioned above about @FlyingFree333 in his adhering to his five redundant attributes; #atheism #materialism #evidentialism #naturalism #antitheism.

For @FlyingFree333 to make the statement, “Truth and compassion form morality, foremost being compassion.” is in @FlyingFree333 being in direct conflict with his five redundant attributes; #atheism #materialism #evidentialism #naturalism and #antitheism.

With that statement @FlyingFree333 is making an absolute truth claim about morality!

For any atheist to mention “truth” brings up a warning and direct contradiction to what atheism teaches. Atheism teaches that there is no absolute truth and that “truth” is what anyone wants it to be. Thus with regard to @FlyingFree333 sending out false RTs from me adheres to the atheist relative truth; meaning whatever @FlyingFree333 wants to do in his eyes is truth regardless of if it actually true or not.

For any atheist to mention “compassion” (the feeling of empathy for others) let along emphasize compassion as the foremost being, goes directly 180 degrees against the teachings of atheism, Darwinian Evolution, and atheist leaders like Richard Dawkins. “The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.” – “This is one of the hardest lessons for humans to learn. We cannot admit that things might be neither good nor evil, neither cruel nor kind, but simply callous – indifferent to all suffering, lacking all purpose.” Richard Dawkins – ‘River out of Eden’ (1995))

Does @FlyingFree333 follow what his Twitter bio lists about him?
With all the consistent contradictions atheists make with regard to morality and not following what they say they believe as appose to their actions, @FlyingFree333 is indeed following what his Twitter bio lists about him.

Because he uses his God given free will to choose deceit over truthfulness, @FlyingFree333 will no doubt continue to produce false RTs by me and misquote RTs from me.

If he continues to use his God given free will to choose to be in consistent in his actions in going against his claimed statement of truth, @FlyingFree333 will continue to be like all atheists.

@FlyingFree333 can today change from his being inconsistent if he chooses to do so. I hope @FlyingFree333 confesses and repents of his sins and accepts Christ Jesus as his Savior. There’s a time coming (sooner than you think) when time runs out. I hope @FlyingFree333 doesn’t wait until that time comes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.