If there is the slightest possibility of God existing and that He has sent His only begotten Son Jesus to be your savior from your transgressions, wouldn’t it be wise to investigate it for yourself?
If you had evidence beyond doubt that God exists as described in the Holy Bible and that He loves you and wants you to be in Heaven with Him forever, would you want to be in Heaven with Him too?

6 Responses

  1. Embiye

    Well Dawkins is one of those what we would call rather posh well bred elite types, the sort who ran the eipmre but never actually got their hands dirty in the process, those who got the knighthoods and the medals and the epithet sir’ when they did bugger all to get it!! And perhaps these people use religion or did in the past to excuse slavery or ruthless exploitation or dismissal of people starving as often happened under the rule of the British Empire like in Ireland and India and no doubt many other places, and when many of these ruling class types realised they were only using religion to control others or give themselves a veneer of respectability, they then stopped believing in God and wanted the rest of us to follow suit, to follow them into the abyss and be as culpable and complicit in savagery as they were. You might see the same things in your country under people like George Bush or the Religious Right or the Prosperity Gospel and such things. None of those people can really believe in a merciful and compassionate God, not really, or they wouldn’t be doing cruel things. To them God, Christianity, religion or whatever you or I call it is just a vehicle to get where they want, and have a load naefve dupes believing them and then saying it wasn’t me that did it, it was God!’ I was only obeying orders, in other words. Do evil, then blame God! That is real blasphemy, because the results of such peoples actions always mean the suffering of someone else.

    1. GospelToday

      You stated it clearly, “Do evil, then blame God!” it is real blasphemy when people preach the Prosperity Gospel, use religion to excuse slavery, exploit, and claim that God told them to do it.

  2. Victor E. Pearson

    Science is a tool people use and real science does not include anything to do with, “luck” or “sheer luck” or even “major infusions of luck” as Richard Dawkins implies it does.
    Using science, one easily confirms much of what is told to us in the Bible. You as many atheists ignore the evidence. Much of the Bible is confirmed by eye witnesses, science, astronomy, biology, archeology, etc. and if you were interested in truth, you’d actually check it out for yourself. Romans 1:15-25

  3. Philip Gilbert

    You are a science denier and are beyond help. What role does your god play in all of this and how do you know he is the one true god?

  4. Victor E. Pearson

    I use common sense and reasoning which clearly Richard Dawkins didn’t use in writing his book, “The God Delusion”
    Take for example Darwinian Evolution and biology and archaeology. No one has ever seen bacteria turn into anything but bacteria; flies turn into anything but flies; etc. For anyone to say that over millions or billions of years something like bacteria eventually over time turned into something else which in turn turned into something different that eventually turned into you and me, is merely a story told by people who start with the notion that was what happened. Study of biology shows that even the most simplest of life form has by far more information in it than a set of encyclopedias and everyone knows that information comes from intelligence. It takes a lot of faith for someone to believe that over millions or billions of years that for no reason nothing turned into something which turned into life which lead to you and me.
    It also takes circular reasoning for anyone to claim that there are such things as “transitional fossils” as fossils don’t come with tags on them saying that they are an ancestor to anything other than to their own kind, i.e., dog, cat, horse, etc.
    Everyone who thinks knows that “luck” doesn’t exist, right? Speaking of how complex the most simplest life form is and to come to life, there are dependent parts which are required and for Darwinian Evolution to have actually occurred, that it is beyond statistical computation and requires by biologist Richard Dawkins in his book, “The God Delusion” “sheer luck” on page 168 in his deluded book. Even more so he goes on page 169 that more “major infusions of luck” are needed to really fill in the gaps. Any rational person knows that there is no such thing as “luck” don’t they? I’m sure you are more rational than to believe in luck, right?

  5. Philip Gilbert

    Richard Dawkins is an evolutionary biologist. What qualifications do you hold? What evidence do you have that any of what Dawkins states is false?

Leave a Reply